Hillary Clinton’s relationship with the Rothschild / Rockefeller establishment is now on full display…

Is America really ready for a female president?

Hillary Clinton’s Relationship With The Rothschild / Rockefeller Establishment Is Now On Full Display
March 31 2016 | From: WakeUpKiwi via TheFreeThoughtProject

Hillary Clinton has been deemed a sure bet for the White House, as it’s widely speculated the inflammatory Donald Trump and socialist-leaning Bernie Sanders stray too far from establishment politics to be truly electable.


Hillary Clinton with Evelyn de Rothschild, Bill Clinton and Lynn Forester de Rothschild

But it wasn’t until an examination using Wikileaks searchable archive of Clinton’s emailsthat the establishment’s love of the Democratic warhawk became truly apparent.

Buried in thousands of the former Secretary of State’s emails sent via her personal server, are intimations of her close relationship with the infamous Rothschild banking family and hints for a potential Rockefeller-State partnership.

Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote an email on April 18, 2010, in which she tells Hillary she would “love to catch up” – and “I remain your loyal adoring pal.” Clinton responds“let’s make that happen,” and signs her response, “Much love, H.”

On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying, “I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going …”

Rothschild responds, thanking Clinton for “personally reaching out to us,” and adds, “You are the best, and we remain your biggest fans.”

A January 9, 2012, email discusses a conference on the environment set to take place at Jacob Rothschild’s “historic estate, Waddesdon.”

On New Year’s Eve 2012, Lynn Forester de Rothschild sent an email to Clinton “praying for” her speedy recovery. “And, my email box is lighting up with all the PUMA’s and their 18M prayers for Hillary campaign,” states the email, which is signed, “Love, Lynn, Evelyn, Ben and Jake.”

An email to Clinton, dated October 15, 2009, from Melanne Verveer – former director of Pres. Obama’s State Department office for Global Women’s Issues and longtime Clinton family insider – states:

“Speaking at UNESCO Monday with the new director on the unfinished Beijing agenda [REDACTED] called to say she wants to give us several million dollars to subsidize a fund to give an annual award for innovation in empowering women that would be a rockefeller-State [sic] partnership.”

Then, on March 10, 2012, Verveer hints at least at a possible locale for Hillary’s future endeavors:

“I forgot to tell you that Judith Rodin offered you a suite of offices after you leave State for your own use at Rockefeller Fdtn, if you’re interested – with no strings attached. She also said they’d be happy to provide you with a month at their center in Bellagio if you just want to read and write in a beautiful place.”

Though none of the emails The Free Thought Project examined appeared overtly damning – thanks, in part, to sometimes heavy redaction – the evidence of Clinton’s comfort with the establishment lends credence to theories of her being the ‘chosen’ candidate.

Numerous emails evidence Hillary’s staff carefully monitoring – and even manipulating – mainstream news outlets as well. Lynn F. de Rothschild told Hillary in August 2009 about a fluff piece journalist Les Gelb was eager to pen for Parade Magazine.

Other emails show an almost paranoid eye Clinton kept trained on the Tea Party and its journalists and mouthpieces.

To reiterate, nothing particularly damning in itself was found in this admittedly cursory search – but the relationships these emails document, alone, evidence Hillary’s concrete establishment roots.

While Trump infuriates the GOP and Sanders’ popular support lacks translation into delegate votes, perhaps these documents support the popular theory Hillary Clinton will be the next president – no matter what.

How hemp became illegal in America…

You may have already heard that even George Washington was growing and using hemp. This isn’t just an urban legend: a diary entry from 1765 notes that he was separating male and female hemp plants. However, it was unlikely that he was cultivating them for their psychoactive properties. Rather, Washington was probably discarding the female plants in favour of the fibrous male plants, which could be used for a variety of purposes. [i]

Hemp was introduced to North America by early colonisers, and apparently even the sails, caulking, and rigging of the Mayflower were made from hemp. As a resilient and adaptable plant, it was a vital cash crop in America’s nascent history, and was used to make fabric, paper, and rope. Hemp was so important that in 1762, Virginia “imposed penalties on those who did not produce it.” [ii] It’s incredible to think that, at one stage, it was actually illegal to not grow hemp.

As cotton became the favoured crop for fabrics and clothing, cannabis took on new uses. By the 1800s, it was a popular medicine for numerous ailments – including pain management, lack of sleep or appetite, gout, rheumatism, cholera, convulsions, and (strangely enough) hydrophobia.[iii] Unlike opium, which was also a common medicine at the time, cannabis tinctures were celebrated for not suppressing patients’ appetites or causing constipation.

Medicinal cannabis was so commonplace that it was even used to treat animals – most notably horses, including those in the US Cavalry.

Read more:

https://massroots.com/blog/the-killer-weed-how-cannabis-became-illegal-in-america-part-1

What was found in this 7th century Quran?

WHAT WAS JUST FOUND IN THIS 7TH CENTURY-OLD QURAN HAS ISLAMISTS PANICKING:

I thought he said and did everything first? These may not have been written by Muhammad after all.

Quran Find Prophet Muhammad

A dusty old Quran tucked away the University of Birmingham library has been holding onto a mystery for centuries, and what was just unearthed could shake the religion of Islam straight to its depraved core. Contained within the seventh century-old Quran, were the fragmented remains of a script written on animal hides, which turned out to be Suras, chapters 18-20 of their religious book. The find has Muslim leaders really disturbed, since these archaic texts pre-date their prophet Muhammad. The scripts are thought to date back to 568AD and 645AD, meaning everything handed down from their prophet came afterwards, proving that the prophet Muhammad’s directives to his followers were fabricated simply for his own personal sick and twisted political agenda. According to historian Tom Holland, the historic find “destabilizes, to put it mildly, the idea that we can know anything with certainty about how the Quran emerged — and that in turn has implications for the history of Muhammad and the Companions.” Another scholar, Keith Small explained that this find could absolutely be devastating to Islam:

RELATED ARTICLES READ MORE and View the Video:

http://www.disclose.tv/news/what_was_just_found_in_this_7th_centuryold_quran_has_islamists_panicking/129593

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/224532/probably_the_oldest_quran_fragments_found_in_birmingham_university/

Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan

Read more:

http://tundratabloids.com/jordan-is-palestine/

Are you living in a computer simulation?

Shades of The Matrix?

 

 Multiversal by R. Ayana

by Nick Bostrom, Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford University

This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations.

Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears. That is the basic idea. The rest of this paper will spell it out more carefully.

Apart form the interest this thesis may hold for those who are engaged in futuristic speculation, there are also more purely theoretical rewards. The argument provides a stimulus for formulating some methodological and metaphysical questions, and it suggests naturalistic analogies to certain traditional religious conceptions, which some may find amusing or thought-provoking.

The structure of the paper is as follows. First, we formulate an assumption that we need to import from the philosophy of mind in order to get the argument started. Second, we consider some empirical reasons for thinking that running vastly many simulations of human minds would be within the capability of a future civilization that has developed many of those technologies that can already be shown to be compatible with known physical laws and engineering constraints. This part is not philosophically necessary but it provides an incentive for paying attention to the rest. Then follows the core of the argument, which makes use of some simple probability theory, and a section providing support for a weak indifference principle that the argument employs. Lastly, we discuss some interpretations of the disjunction, mentioned in the abstract, that forms the conclusion of the simulation argument.

Read more:

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.co.nz/2016/03/are-you-living-in-computer-simulation.html